Come with me on the following hypothetical ...
PART ONE
If you already had the following musical instruments, and were capable of playing each extraordinarily well (I did say it was hypothetical, didn't I?):
Acoustic steel string guitar, electric guitar, mandolin, electric bass and electric lap steel
and
1. You were in the process of creating a 32-track home studio in which to record said instruments,
2. Aforementioned 32-track home studio did offer the ability to build and record pretty decent sounding and flexible rhythm and drum tracks,
3. Your musical focus was alt.country, Americana, progressive bluegrass, and most other kinds of acoustic string music, folk and blues,
4. You had sufficient budget to purchase another instrument, either one additional instrument of pretty good quality, or two of OK quality,
5. You were capable of playing any number of additional instruments rather well, including the choices below, and
6. You could purchase either a dobro (resonator guitar), violin (fiddle) or banjo (remember -- 1 good to fine quality or 2 lower to OK quality)
which new instrument would YOU choose to buy, and why?
PART TWO
If listening to aforesaid recorded music, understanding the following:
1. Traditional "bluegrass" music typically consists of acoustic guitar, bass, fiddle, banjo and (mandolin and/or dobro, usually one or the other)
2. Traditional "country" music typically consists of acoustic and electric guitars, bass, fiddle, lap steel (with optional piano)
3. Traditional "folk" music typically consists of acoustic guitar, bass (optional), mandolin, banjo and fiddle in some combination
4. Traditional "blues" music typically consists of acoustic and/or electric guitar, dobro and bass
which would you personally prefer to listen to?
which would you prefer to avoid?
which would you be interested in seeing performed live?
That's all. End of hypothetical.
Of course, it isn't. Hypothetical, that is; at least for me. Thanks for your insight and comment.